A British epidemiologist said on Tuesday he was worried by close links between World Health Organization (WHO) officials and pharmaceutical companies over swine flu. Recent Danish media reports alleged that the WHO, which on June 11 declared swine flu a pandemic, has teamed up with pharmaceutical companies to create a scare and cash in on selling a remedy. In an interview with Russia’s BFM.ru, Tom Jefferson, a scientist currently based in Rome, said that although he personally did not believe in plots, “I am a bit worried about what I have observed.” He said WHO expert committees have “people with extensive ties to the industry or decision-makers who have explicitly kept on producing apocalyptic forecasts year in, year out.”

Why does the media devote so much coverage to a relatively small health issue?  The News Media is just an arm of the Public Relation Companies that represent Big Business and in this case Big Medicine.  There are too many health scares to list, ranging from depression and vaccines to AIDS, and even the myth that Cholesterol is bad for you, or milk is good for you.  There is no direct evidence that links Cholesterol to heart attacks, yet Cholesterol medicine represents the biggest money maker for the drug companies. America could solve its health care issues by simply encouraging better diets, exercise and natural cures rather than depending on the “miracle” drugs that seem to do more damage than good.  The first step would be to stop subsidizing corn.  Corn products are too cheap and somehow find their way into most food products.  This disrupts the market and makes unhealthy food too cheap and abundant, causing most people to eat too many corn related products, and this is at the heart of America’s National Health epidemic.

Lets examine some of the “health” policies being pushed by the big drug companies.  There is a little known clause in the WTO concerning the international trade of food called Codex Alimentarius.  This is a Napoleonic Code stemming from the Austria Hungarian Empire.  Napoleonic Codes are different than Common Law in that all that is not permitted is forbidden rather than what is not prohibited is allowed.  In other words, something is only legal if it is stated specifically if you are using Napoleonic Codes as is the case with Codex Alementarius.

Fritz Der Meer was a convicted war criminal who worked for I.G. Farben and later worked for Bayer until 1961.  I.G. Farben, the German(American funded) Nazi war company, was later split up into BASF, Bayer, and Hoechst.  It was Meer’s idea to implement Codex Alimentarius through the UN in 1962.  It was a long-term plan that hoped to be official by December 31st 2009.  Currently, Codex is funded by the WHO and FAO at the request of the UN.  Any disputes between two countries involving food are resolved through Codex.  The country that is compliant with Codex regulations is automatically the winner regardless of the merit of the case.  Therefore, all WTO countries are rushing to be Codex compliant.  The problem is that many existing health laws in each country contradict Codex’s.  Health laws are on behalf of citizens while Codex’s trade laws are on behalf of corporations, trade and health laws are a natural contradiction to each other.

In 1994, DSHEA, the Dietary Supplementary Health and Education Act was passed in America.  It classified nutrients and herbs as foods.  Many of Codex’s guidelines contradict DSHEA.  For example, in 1994, Codex declared many nutrients as poisons and to be used in limited amounts.  However, many real poisons have been deemed safe by Codex.  In 2001, 176 different countries banned 12 really dangerous POP chemicals(9 of which are pesticides) due to their toxic nature.  Codex has brought back seven of those pesticides.  Therefore, imported foods are considered safe, even if they use some of these previously considered toxic pesticides.  Furthermore, all dairy cows MUST BE (RGH) recombinant growth hormone compliant and ALL animals must be treated with sub clinical antibiotics and growth hormones to meet the new Codex requirements.  Also, all food must be irradiated(treated with radiation in order to kill bacteria), unless eaten raw and locally in order to meet the new standards.

Codex is going to supersede all health standards in all nations with regard to the standards of imported and exported food products.  Is it a good idea to mix health standards with trade organizations?   America’s health system has been ruined by making it a for profit industry.  Should we do the same with our food and nutrition?  Codex projects that their mineral and vitamin guidelines will result in a minimum of 3 billion deaths, one billion from starvation and 2 billion resulting from malnutrition that could lead to preventable diseases like cancer, diabetes and cardiac problems.

This all seems very implausible.  How can these drug companies be so evil?  History has a tendency to repeat itself.  I.G. Farben made the gas for Auschwitz.  Bayer and BASF are spin offs of this war criminal corporation.  Bayer didn’t attempt to distant itself from the Holocaust by re-hiring Fritz Der Meer to run its company after he got out of prison.  This might explain why Bayer was so brash in their attempt to dump medicine tainted with AIDS on Europe, Asia and Latin America.   (please click on this link to watch this shocking segment on MSNBC) The drug companies have their roots in Nazi Germany and they didn’t try to cut those roots after the war.  They re-hired former employees that were convicted of war crimes.  Do vaccines eventually cause diseases that will require expensive future treatment?  If so, it would be very disgusting, but it would be profitable and these companies have done worse in the past.  It is time for people to do their own health research.  Do vaccines prevent or cause diseases?  Is milk good for you?  Why are American cows the only cows in the world fed corn?  A lot of knowledge is based on “junk science” or fallacy of tradition.  We assume something to be true because one side is all we have ever heard.  Doctors are not the experts we think they are. Get a second opinion from someone who isn’t getting a free trip to Hawaii when they sign you up for your third prescription.  People need to live healthier, take preventable measures and get off the pills.

Here is a link to an absurdly long list of health problems caused by Big Pharmaceuticals.

http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/THE_FOUNDATION/News/2009/pharmaceutical_business/index.htm

-George Orwell-

Post 9/11 American consciousness is the epitome of Orwell’s contradictory mindset of Doublethink.  A self proclaimed moral and religious nation on Sundays allows two ton bombs to be dropped in its name daily on defenseless targets who have never done any harm to America.  The American media has created a illogical vacuum of consciousness where Doublethink is the prevailing and accepted logic.  America claims moral superiority in its “War on Terror,” while inflicting an unquestionably higher degree of terror on those who oppose America’s hegemonic ambitions. It’s incredulous and telling that one needs to provide evidence to support these obvious facts, as is always the case when dissenting against power rather than supporting it, even when the truth is obviously apparent.  America is clearly the biggest instigator of terror in the world having bombed over 40 countries and meddled in countless foreign affairs, instigated and orchestrated coups and destroyed hundreds if not thousands of buildings, yet maintains a moral superiority stemming from 9/11 when there was an attack on just three American buildings. This justification is a perversion of logic and is the essence of Doublethink, being able to drop bombs and kill civilians on a daily basis in numerous countries while maintaining a moral superiority or justification based on 9/11.  How many countries and innocent people have to suffer before America has its revenge?  By the way, there are numerous reports in newspapers around the world that America was planning an invasion of Afghanistan before 9/11 and America was conducting bombing missions against the Taliban so one could obviously conclude that 9/11 was an act of retribution not an unprovoked attack.

American foreign relations is the definition of hypocrisy or like a parent would say, “do as I say, not as I do.”  If terrorism is defined as causing destruction to a building while killing civilians then America causes exponentially more terrorism than the supposed terrorists. During WWI civilian casualties represented about 10% of all deaths.  Sadly, that figure has steadily risen to about 90% in Iraq and Afghanistan due to the invention of indiscriminate bombs and missiles.  These facts contradict Orwellian speech preached by the government and then dutifully repeated without question by the “watchdog” media.  For example, supposed “smart bombs” that rarely hit their target and in fact mostly kill civilians or cause “collateral damage” are just euphemisms for death used to quell popular dissent.  These bombs are neither smart nor accurate.  The nobility of war and honor has clearly been lost, if there ever was such nobility.

It is time that the American people understand the actions being taken by their government on their behalf and have a truthful debate about the pros and cons of such foreign “adventures.”  This debate has never happened in America due to a tightly controlled media and sophisticated agenda setting mechanisms.  Instead, the same pattern inevitably follows; begin with a war myth invented by the media, and then repeated over and over again until it is futile to question this narrative.  A scapegoat is then created in order to focus public support against a known enemy. The true geopolitical reasons are ignored and don’t come out until years later through declassified documents and books.  Is the economic gain in order to preserve “our way of life” worth the pain and suffering that it causes the rest of the world and the inevitable “blowback” that results?  It is time to have a real debate without slogans, sayings or perversions of logic masked in religion or patriotism, and to step out of the corporate media invented consciousness and into the reality of those whom America bombs on a daily basis.  America needs to confront its shocking history of indiscriminate violence around the world and have an honest debate based on facts, not myths like “supporting democracy” or fallacies based on word play.  Only then can America cleanse itself of its abhorrent treatment of others and  be capable to improve the lives of all that it influences, both at home and abroad.

Martin’s model attempts to predict highs and lows of markets and has been shown to have shocking accuracy.  He is currently in jail for supposedly running a Ponzi scheme in Japan.  However, his case is not that simple.  He spent seven years in jail for contempt, supposedly from withholding the location of certain assets.  In 2006, he plead guilty to a fraud charge and received 5 years.  His seven years in prison for contempt is one of the longest in the history of the United States.

Martin Armstrong claims he is in jail because he wouldn’t play ball with Wall Street.  The movie Pi is based on his life.  Apparently, the CIA and the Chinese government all wanted his computer models for their own.  He has been accused of manipulating the world market’s and his model’s ability to predict markets is beyond scary.

The government obviously has an axe to grind with Armstrong.  There have been a lot of irregularities concerning his case.  They tried to illegally move him to a more dangerous prison while his trial was under appeal.  There was an attempt on his life and the perpetrator has never been brought to justice, nor has he received dental treatment to repair the damage from the attack(3). It just seems hard to believe that he would spend 7 years in jail for contempt if he only had to disclose the location of a few items.  He claims the government wanted the computer code for his economic model.

He now writes weekly essays on the state of the economy and the tyrannical “justice system” (4) of the United States.  His essays are well worth reading.

http://economicedge.blogspot.com/2009/04/martin-armstrong-why-models-are-our.html

The Council on Foreign Relations(CFR) has about 4000 members. It’s members belong to  all aspects of the US government including the State Department, Senate, Congress, Judicial Branch, Ambassadors and Military.  They also have key members in the private sector where they dominate the Federal Reserve, Banking Institutions, Media, Energy Companies, Industry, Business, Ivy League Education, Labor Unions and Tax-Exempt Foundations(1). Therefore, policy never changes regardless of which side wins the election.  The election and “political debates” are an orchestrated circus to amuse and distract the public.  The CFR seems to exude the most power and influence on American policy, yet is rarely mentioned and basically unknown to the average person. The CFR claims that “it has no affiliation with the US government,” a more honest assessment would be that it is the US government.  It has had at least 100 members in every administration since Wilson, more representation than can be said of either “political party.”  The silence in the News Media is easily understood when one looks at its members.  Most owners of media like Rupert Murdoch and Ted Eisner belong to the CFR, as well as the faces of News Media like Tom Brokaw, Dan Rather, Barbara Walters and Jim Lehrer.  If you digress from the official story then you are fired (see Tom Donahue during the buildup to the current Iraq war on MSNBC).  The CFR is able to dominate both public opinion and policy through control of the Media and Higher Education.

The CFR was founded in 1921 by John W. Davis, J.P Morgan’s personal attorney.  It is a branch of the English Round Table Group the Royal Institute of International Affairs, started by Cecil Rhodes, the famous imperialist and coloniser of Rhodesia (modern-day Zimbabwe) and De Beers Diamond Company.  Other founding members included J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Otto Kahn, and Jacob Schiff.  These are the same bankers that helped start the Federal Reserve.  They also played a large role in the buildup of Hitler and I.G. Farben (refer to my Banks are the Masters post) that eventually led to WWII.   Felix Frankfurter, Justice of the Supreme Court (1939-1962), said: “The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes.” In a letter to an associate dated November 21, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt wrote, “The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”  Andrew Jackson was the last President to successfully fight the Federal Banks.  Interestingly, fighting the Federal Reserve is something that all assassinated US Presidents have in common.  The banks clearly have the power and the CFR is their tool to spread their world agenda.

Baron M.A. Rothschild, the true power behind J.P Morgan and all the world’s central banks, wrote, “Give me control over a nation’s currency and I care not who makes its laws.”  The ability to print money and cause inflation or deflation is the root of all power.  The Central Banks around the world increase the money supply causing investment bubbles and then pull the money out.  They can then buy everything back at a considerable discount.  This has happened time and time again since the beginning of the Central Banking System in both Europe and America.  Thomas Jefferson wrote: “The Central Bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the principles and form of our Constitution…if the American people allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”  This quote sure seems applicable to our current economic condition.

Georgetown professor Dr. Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton’s mentor while at Georgetown and CFR member who had access to their historical records in order to write a book on the CFR) wrote about the goals of the investment bankers who control central banks: “… nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole… controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.”  The leaders of central banks meet every other month in Basel, Switzerland at the Bank of International Settlements(BIS).  They also meet at various other meetings conducted by the CFR, Bilderberg Group, and the Tri-lateral Commission among others.  These meetings between the “masters of the universe” get little to no media coverage.  The policies decided at these meetings arguably have the most significant ramifications for every human on the planet  The media needs to cover these meetings extensively if we can consider them an informative asset for the public.

Some people will argue that the CFR is just a group that tries to help the US Government solve various issues around the world, a sort of mix between a lobbyist group and a think tank.  Let’s review the CFR’s own Mission Statement.   It seems to contradict this benign stance and its goals appear to be quite brash.

The Council on Foreign Relations is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries.

Founded in 1921, the Council takes no institutional positions on matters of policy. The Council carries out its mission by:

• Maintaining a diverse membership, including special programs to promote interest and develop expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders;Supporting a Studies Program that fosters independent research, enabling Council scholars to produce articles, reports, and books and hold Roundtables that analyze foreign policy issues and make concrete policy recommendations;Publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal of international affairs and U.S. foreign policy;Sponsoring Independent Task Forces that produce reports with both findings and policy prescriptions on the most important foreign policy topics; and Providing up-to-date information and analysis about world events and American foreign policy on its website, CFR.org.By their own admission they hope to shape public policy and they do considering how many of their members occupy high level positions of power.  How and more importantly why is an organization so powerful as the CFR shrouded in such secrecy?  Most meetings are held in secret and members of the meetings are not allowed to divulge the contents of the meeting or quote other members.  At the very least, the CFR needs to be more transparent.  Their financial records should be made public in order to understand conflicts of interest and biases.  Too many politicians and policy makers are connected to this organization for its core agenda to be a secret.  Their is a thin line between the goals of big business and that of the CFR.  The US government is supposed to represent the people, not big corporations.  Sadly, there are numerous examples where government has failed to act responsibly and on behalf of its people.  The US Government is shockingly out of touch with the wants of the American public, this fact is evident by looking at numerous polls about government policy.  For example, most Americans have wanted US Forces out of Iraq for years.  The government seems to be more concerned with the policy wants of the CFR than the American Public.  It is time for the American public to wake up and force the government to change its destructive course, hopefully this can happen and the government can once again be for the people and by the people.

History repeated itself both on Wall Street and in the news.  The news reported a bailout for AIG, even though it was really a bailout for the investment banks disguised as a bailout for AIG.  This is the same ruse performed by the media when “reporting” on a bailout for some third world country, the money isn’t for the people of that country, it is for the investment bankers who made the bad loan to that country.  The money gets transferred from Washington to them and then back to New York.

Banks rule the world and they know it.  They routinely fund both sides of all wars and the rest of the world are all slaves.  Private companies print money and loan it to the public with interest.  Large organizations like the BIS control money flow and interest rates through central banks.  They help create wars in order to increase the debt load of individual countries and thus their influence over politics.

Let’s look at Hitler and his rise to power in the Nazi party.  American companies and banks helped Hitler rise to power and created the Nazi war machine, both before and during World War II.  These facts were known at the time, but since the banks control everything this information was dismissed and suppressed.

After WWII, the Kilgore Committee was formed by the US Congress to investigate American business collisions with Nazi Germany and Japan.  The connections are too numerous to mention them all.  The Committee dubiously explained away the obvious connections as “accidental” or an example of “short-sightedness.”  The accidental explanation is ludicrous if you consider the transfer of technology, money, resources and interlocking boards of directors on American and German companies and banks.

Henry Ford was an early fan of Hitler.  It was reported in December of 1922 in the NYT that Henry Ford was financing Adolph Hitler’s Nationalist and anti-Semitic movements in Munich.  Hitler used some sections of Ford’s book The International Jew to write Mein Kampf while in prison.  On Ford’s 75th birthday he received the Grand Cross, the highest Nazi award to a foreigner, the first to be awarded in the USA.  Ford’s plants in France and Germany were not bombed during the war.  His son, Edsel Ford, sat on the board of directors of the American Subsidiary I.G. Farben.  I.G. Farben was Germany’s most important war manufacturing company and many of its board members were later convicted of war crimes.  I.G. Farben was broken up into smaller companies after the war.  It became Bayer and 3M, and some of the convicted war criminals from Farben later became members of their boards upon release from prison.  This might help to explain the insidious, evil ways (1) of the drug companies today, having their roots in Nazi Germany and direct historical ties to concentration camps.

The empire of I.G. Farben was largely responsible for WWII and had numerous connections with the Wall Street elite.  They owned coal mines, electric power plants, iron and steel units, banks, research units and numerous commercial enterprises.  There were over 21,000 cartel agreements between Farben and foreign countries.  By 1939 28/43 of their major products were produced for war.  They were the largest earner of foreign currency, which was necessary to purchase strategic raw materials.

Farben had close ties with Wall Street.  Numerous business elites were on their American board of directors; Walter Teagle of Standard Oil and the Federal Reserve, Edsel Ford of Ford Motor Company, Paul Warburg and H.A. Mentz of the Bank of Manhattan, and Charles E. Mitchell of the Federal Reserve.  These are direct connections to the Nazi War machine.  The German members of the same board were not so lucky as their American partners at the end of the war and many were convicted of war crimes including Max Ilgner, and F. Ter Meer among others.

It is obvious that Farben had close and direct ties with the movers and shakers of Wall Street.  They also did a lot of business with American firms that had subsidiaries in Germany including Dow, Alcoa, Standard Oil, Opel, Bendix Aviation, GE and I.T.T.

The two largest tank producers in Germany were Opel, a wholly owned subsidiary of General Motors(Owned by JP Morgan) and Ford A.G(German subsidiary of Ford).(2) Alcoa and Dow worked closely with Nazi industry with transfers of domestic U.S. chemical technology.  Bendix aviation supplied Siemens with automatic pilot and aircraft instruments.  They received royalty payments into 1940 for their diesel engine starters.

Standard Oil of New Jersey helped fuel the Nazi Air force.  Remember, Walter Teagle sat on the board of directors of the Federal Reserve, I.G. Farben and Standard Oil forming a pretty cozy relationship between big oil, big banking and Nazi Germany.  Standard Oil and Farben signed the JASCO agreement where Standard Oil handed over its oil processing patents in exchange for Farben’s synthetic rubber formulas.  These chemical patents enabled Germany to conduct modern warfare and start WWII.  These exchanges were authorized by the US War Department in 1935.

There are tons of more examples of collusion between Nazi Germany and American businesses.  However, the banking cartels are the true puppet masters.  These companies are mostly owned by various banking giants including JP Morgan, Rockefeller and most importantly, the now insulated Rothschilds.  JP Morgan was thought to be the richest man of his time until his will showed that about 80% of his wealth was really that of the Rothschilds, who are really at the center of all international banking organizations.

At this time a cartel of private central bankers controlled the money supply for most industrialized nations.   The New York Federal Reserve System, the bank of England, the Reichsbank in Germany and the Banque de France were and continue to this day to be more or less in control of the various governments of each country through campaign finance, media control and political influence.  Hoover blamed Wall Street for his presidential loss on the sudden and swift change of support of the banks.  Today, Obama’s biggest financial contributors were the same organizations that he and Bush bailed out.  The Federal Reserve was partly founded by the Warburgs, the same brothers who sat on the board of the German and American divisions of I.G. Farben during WWII.  Farben doubled in size and increased its war products production leading up to WWII.  This money flowed in from New York’s National City Bank funneled(laundered) through the BIS.

The Bank for International Settlements(BIS), formed in 1930 from the Young plan, was meant to deal with the reparation payments imposed on Germany after WWI.  It quickly turned into a place where central bankers from around the world were able to control and coordinate money supply and politics.  They continued to meet and work together during the war despite the fact that many of their respective nations were at war with each other.  Ironically, dividend payments from Germany to England continued to be paid as the Luftwasa conducted nightly bombing campaigns on London.  This sad fact was debated in Parliament, but apparently most thought it would be easier to maintain the status quo than to go against the BIS.  Try to put this abhorrent behavior in the context of WWII, a time when individuals were asked to make the ultimate sacrifice, buy war bonds and plant Victory Gardens in order to participate in the war effort.  Meanwhile, for the world’s bankers it was business as usual.

Hjalmar Schacht (3) was the representative for Hitler to the BIS.  He helped funnel money from National City Bank into Farben.  The representative for America came from National City Bank.  The Nazi’s used their BIS accounts to store gold they had stolen from Poland and Czekoslovakia.  The BIS appointed an American to lead as a sign of neutrality during the war.  He continued to lead when America became involved in the war and worked closely with other bankers whose respective countries remained at war.

It is historically clear that Wall Street and the big companies it backed were largely responsible for the build up of I.G. Farben and ultimately, Nazi Germany.  The connections are more than “casual” or “short sighted” as explained by the Kilgore Committee.  They were part of a larger plan hatched by the Council on Foreign Relations and Wall Street to create the Nazi war machine.  War money later flowed into their companies on behalf of the American public in order to fight Germany, the very nation they helped build up.  The debt created by the war would be financed by the banks and paid for by the tax payers.  This is a form of financial slavery.  The people who control the banking, media, government and instruments of war are one and the same.  History continues to repeat itself.  Hopefully, the latest banking disaster and continuous wars can make people realize the true nature of reality and who is in control.  It is time we audit the Federal Reserve Bank.  The Bloomberg News organization is currently suing the Federal Reserve and attempting to conduct some sort of audit on behalf of the American taxpayer. Where did the bailout money go?  Why was one company allowed to fail and another survive?  Were the reasons simple cronyism or did it make financial sense?

It is clear that banks have no morals whatsoever and operate outside of the law.  Their goal is to enslave all of humanity with endless debt.  The easiest way to incur national debt is to start a war.  Hopefully, humanity can realize this and stop waging wars on behalf of banks.

Further Reading:

Chapter 1 – A Bank for All Reasons
From: ‘Trading With The Enemy, How the Allied multinationals supplied Nazi Germany throughout World War Two’ – By Charles Higham – pub. Robert Hale, London – 1983 – ISBN 0 7090 10230

Dr. Kary Mullis, Biochemist, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry.

It is hard to examine AIDS from an objective standpoint.  Most people were brought up with the dogmatic fact that HIV=Aids=Death.  The predictions of a world epidemic by the media were extensive and exhaustive.  Even today, most people think that any sexual contact with an infected person will result in the acquisition of AIDS.  The media has lied from the beginning about everything to do with AIDS.  The CDC originally hired a PR firm to create the myth that everyone was a candidate for AIDS, not just inter-venous drug users and homosexuals.  It has become impossible to question the religion of AIDS.  The top five medical journals refuse to print any other AIDS theories regardless of supporting evidence.  This campaign and suppression of knowledge has fueled a cottage industry of AIDS, making unlikely bed partners ranging from conglomerate drug corporations to NGO’s and African Health Organizations.  The deaths of AIDS are greatly exaggerated as are its causes.

“I do not regard the causal relationship between HIV and any disease as settled. I have seen considerable evidence that highly improper statistics concerning HIV and AIDS have been passed off as science, and that top members of the scientific establishment have carelessly, if not irresponsible, joined the media in spreading misinformation about the nature of AIDS.” (Yale Scientific, Fall 1994)

Dr. Serge Lang, Professor of Mathematics, Yale University

In Haiti 800 couples whom one partner had AIDS were followed for 8 years.  Only 36 new cases of AIDS were found amongst these couples.  A 10 year UCSF study showed that one has a 1/1000 chance of acquiring AIDS if they have heterosexual sex with an infected person.  It is no wonder that the epidemic never spread in the heterosexual world.  In 2007 it is estimated that .006 percent of the population has AIDS in America.  I doubt the numbers are that high. In fact, AIDS cases in America peaked in 1993, not the infection curve one would expect from a viral disease.  Actually, AIDS fails all 8 predictions of a virus including Koch’s postulates. No doctor or nurse has ever contracted AIDS from work, yet over a 1000 annually are infected from treating Hepatitis patients, it makes one wonder.    In recent years, most AIDS patients are dying from liver failure.  This is caused by drugs like AZT, not Aids.  AZT was originally a cancer drug that was deemed too dangerous for patients.  However, it is OK to take AZT if you have AIDS since you will be dead anyways.  It is hard to determine how many people have died from the drugs designed to fight AIDS rather than the disease itself.  Many doctors have found that giving drugs to supposedly asymptomatic HIV positive patients has hastened the effect of AIDS or maybe even been solely responsible for the symptoms.  What if HIV isn’t directly correlated to AIDS?  Are the drugs doing more damage than the disease?  Lets examine the validity of the HIV test since a HIV positive result will ultimately lead patients down the path of death caused either by the disease or the cocktail of drugs used to fight it.

Most people would be surprised to find that the HIV test doesn’t test for a virus and it is very unreliable.  In fact, there are different criteria for a positive test result based on whichever agency conducted the test.  The Western Blot Test results vary significantly from country to country, even differing between the Red Cross and the CDC according to an article by Val Turner.

“The ELISA and Western Blot tests commonly used to diagnose HIV infection detect only interactions between proteins and antibodies thought to be specific for HIV — they do not detect HIV itself. And contrary to popular belief, newer “viral load” tests do not measure levels of actual virus in the blood.”

http://www.aliveandwell.org/html/questioning/questioningthetests.html

England stopped using this test in the late 1980′s.  It is odd to test blood for a viral infection affecting your immune system considering it only represents about 3% of the immune system and it would be much more practical to test the tissue.  The HIV test does not test for a virus.  It only detects antibodies that react with proteins that experts claim are related to HIV.  This is a casual relationship at best and is by no means a gold standard.  For example, in 1988, 90,000 blood samples were tested from a Pittsburgh hospital in order to gauge the new epidemic.  It found a staggering 25% positive ratio among men and 8% among woman.  Of course, we now know that these rates of infection are impossible.  What if AZT was given to each individual who had tested positive?   More than likely the drug would have killed them and their death would have been classified as another AIDS casualty.  This happened to many people in the 1980′s and early 1990′s.  Could this be happening again today with the new miracle “cocktail drugs” lauded by the News Media?

Africa is the epicenter of AIDS testing for the big drug companies.  Expensive trials of cocktail drugs are being conducted everyday at a cost of $200 per day per patient.  That is more money in one day than many Africans make in a year.  Why are HIV rates in Africa so different from the rest of world?  Could it be because the data is simply false?  HIV rates in Africa are about equal between men and woman, while it is about a 10 to 1 ratio for men in the rest of the world.  Other factors such as malnutrition, Malaria and TB all have similar symptoms to AIDS and all also weaken the immune system.  Scientists count deaths from TB as being AIDS related because the patient must have had a weakened immune system from AIDS in order to acquire TB.  This logic is seriously flawed, does that mean you can’t die from just plain TB anymore?  Africans have poor immune systems due to years of malnutrition, poor hygiene, contaminated water, high rates of diarrhea, malaria, etc.  These problems are not new to Africa, but they were never able to get funding to solve these problems in the past.  AIDS is the only cause that seems to gain traction in the West due to its political nature.  The funding is available to pass out condoms and AIDS literature but not for infrastructure or basic health projects.  Which route would save more lives?  The answer is obvious. Condoms and AIDS literature probably do more harm than good.  The West has managed to put the burden of guilt on the ‘promiscuous” Africans and their non-Christian lifestyles as opposed to flawed infrastructure and food supply due to years of colonialism, unfair trade practices and economic blackmail in the form of interest related loans.  AIDS is a death sentence in Africa.  Patients are isolated, fed less and all hope for the future is lost.  It is difficult to plan for the future when many think they are doomed today.

There will never be an honest debate in the News Media about AIDS because too many groups need AIDS; the drug companies, the churches, the NGO’s and university scientists for research grants.  It lags behind other diseases for cause of death but leads in fund-raising.  Nobody wants to kill or question the golden goose, least of all our “watchdog” media.  We continue to fight a “war” on AIDS, a war that has no end and wastes a ton of money and resources.  The Scientists that happen to question the AIDS cannon are shunned and have there funding cut off.  This happened to Peter Deusberg of UC Berkeley.  It is time to take politics and religion out of scientific and medical discourse if we are ever going to properly treat AIDS.

Please do your own research and come to your own conclusions.  Forget everything you have “learned” or think you “know” about AIDS.  Listen to the numerous scientists who doubt the connection of HIV and AIDS.  More importantly, if you or someone you know has tested “positive” for AIDS than you should stay off the cocktail drugs and look for alternate treatment.  The biggest correlation to AIDS is syphilis and other STD’s, not HIV.

A lot of information from this Post came from this documentary:

http://www.sprword.com/videos/aidsinc/

The Media never explains why things happen, they hide in a cloak of “objectivity” rendering their reports meaningless.  One has to really read into the news to figure what is happening.  I learned about the European Union’s R.E.A.C.H. initiative concerning toxic chemicals in a USA Today news report.  However, the story concentrated on the misuse of government funding rather than the public health implications concerning the initiative.  I had to do an internet search to find out what they were talking about.  Apparently, the US government paid for some DOW Chemical employees to fly to Greece in order to lobby the President of the European.  Europe had the insane notion that companies should have to prove that chemicals are safe before being allowed to use them in a product.  As it stands today, the burden of prove is on the public to show which chemicals cause health problems.  This seems like a pretty important story to me, especially considering the amount of chemicals in the average persons blood stream in the middle of our cancer epedemic.  The USA Today felt that the minor corruption problem was more news worthy than the Chemical Companies potentially being responsible for massive health epidemics world wide.  However, this story does make it crystal clear who the government is interested in protecting.  Government truly is the shadow of business, not a force to protect the public’s interest.  These kinds of under reported stories are endless.

A high percentage of stories now come from Public Relation Firms.  A lot of news outlets will use the material given to them and then maybe do a few voice overs to make it seem like they had a part in it.  It saves a lot of money.  Public Relations was invented by the nephew of Freud, a one  Edward Bernays.  The original name for PR was Propaganda and that is exactly what we get with today’s news.

The News should mirror the concerns of the public it supposedly serves.  A major car accident isn’t really news, it is just a photo-op distraction.  The total public is and was against the bailout, yet the government continues to just throw money at the problem without clear policy debate.  The media just quotes the “experts” and moves on without any dissent or analysis, hardly the behavior of a “watchdog” organization.

I hope others can offer links to the hard to find news stories that matter and debates on important government and social policies.  It is clear that we can not depend on mainstream media for “fair and balanced” reporting.  They only offer distractions and not information in order to have an informed citizen.  Please help me find these important news stories.

Here is my favorite documentary website.  Click on the “must watch” tab.

http://www.sprword.com/